<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Lite Versions of SolarQuest and aMaze!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toucharcade.com/2008/08/28/free-lite-versions-of-solarquest-and-amaze/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toucharcade.com/2008/08/28/free-lite-versions-of-solarquest-and-amaze/</link>
	<description>... keeping in touch with the latest in iPhone gaming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhySoSerious</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2008/08/28/free-lite-versions-of-solarquest-and-amaze/#comment-2379</link>
		<dc:creator>WhySoSerious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=555#comment-2379</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s be nice for the OP to give reasons why he/she prefers one app over the other.  otherwise, what&#039;s the point of saying &quot;i prefer this app!&quot; and leaving it at that?  as if i base my purchases off people i don&#039;t know, suggesting things to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it's be nice for the OP to give reasons why he/she prefers one app over the other.  otherwise, what's the point of saying "i prefer this app!" and leaving it at that?  as if i base my purchases off people i don't know, suggesting things to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhySoSerious</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2008/08/28/free-lite-versions-of-solarquest-and-amaze/#comment-289714</link>
		<dc:creator>WhySoSerious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=555#comment-289714</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s be nice for the OP to give reasons why he/she prefers one app over the other.  otherwise, what&#039;s the point of saying &quot;i prefer this app!&quot; and leaving it at that?  as if i base my purchases off people i don&#039;t know, suggesting things to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it's be nice for the OP to give reasons why he/she prefers one app over the other.  otherwise, what's the point of saying "i prefer this app!" and leaving it at that?  as if i base my purchases off people i don't know, suggesting things to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregz0r</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2008/08/28/free-lite-versions-of-solarquest-and-amaze/#comment-2375</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregz0r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=555#comment-2375</guid>
		<description>Probably just to be controversial, lol. Amaze! is decent, but not quite as slick as Labyrinth - which will be perfected with the sounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably just to be controversial, lol. Amaze! is decent, but not quite as slick as Labyrinth - which will be perfected with the sounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregz0r</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2008/08/28/free-lite-versions-of-solarquest-and-amaze/#comment-289713</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregz0r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=555#comment-289713</guid>
		<description>Probably just to be controversial, lol. Amaze! is decent, but not quite as slick as Labyrinth - which will be perfected with the sounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably just to be controversial, lol. Amaze! is decent, but not quite as slick as Labyrinth - which will be perfected with the sounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhySoSerious</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2008/08/28/free-lite-versions-of-solarquest-and-amaze/#comment-2357</link>
		<dc:creator>WhySoSerious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=555#comment-2357</guid>
		<description>why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhySoSerious</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2008/08/28/free-lite-versions-of-solarquest-and-amaze/#comment-289712</link>
		<dc:creator>WhySoSerious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=555#comment-289712</guid>
		<description>why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blakespot</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2008/08/28/free-lite-versions-of-solarquest-and-amaze/#comment-2351</link>
		<dc:creator>blakespot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=555#comment-2351</guid>
		<description>I prefer Amaze! to Labyrinth, for the record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer Amaze! to Labyrinth, for the record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blakespot</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2008/08/28/free-lite-versions-of-solarquest-and-amaze/#comment-289711</link>
		<dc:creator>blakespot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=555#comment-289711</guid>
		<description>I prefer Amaze! to Labyrinth, for the record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer Amaze! to Labyrinth, for the record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/7 queries in 0.011 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 260/264 objects using memcached

Served from: toucharcade.com @ 2012-02-10 06:48:19 -->
