Discussion has followed long after even such a supportive contribution from Unity CCO Nicholas:
"... we made those assets to be used. The more people use them, the happier I am. We want people to do stuff like this."

Discussion has followed long after even such a supportive contribution from Unity CCO Nicholas:
"... we made those assets to be used. The more people use them, the happier I am. We want people to do stuff like this."

I will say that we play maybe 25 games for every 1 we post about. I don't randomly grab a bad game out of the pile and point it out as being bad and not worth a play. I'm not sure who wants to read that and the volume of bad games moving through the App Store is huge.

If there is a situation where a game has been highly anticipated or gotten a great deal of lead-up media coverage and ended up being a real stinker of a title -- that's a scenario in which writing up a bad game is valuable to our readers, in my opinion. If it's a highly unique game that stands out in some way, but is lacking in others, we'll report it - that's worth knowing about.

I stand by the fact that I find Paper Pilot amusing to play. I've always loved the FPS maps made out to be set in a living room or a bathroom, etc. Macusernick recommended Toy Commander. I love that game on my Dreamcast. Is Paper Pilot as good a game as Toy Commander? Not nearly. But, though the graphics were used (legitimately it seems) from the Unity samples (and I was unaware of this when writing the article), they look rather nice. I do agree that Clever Coding's effort here would seem somewhat more impressive had they created their own environments.

I enjoy "flying" through the rooms. But, is it a flight simulator? No.

I mentioned there are certain framerate issues and bemoaned the fact that running into a wall does not crash the paper airplane. I don't feel that I made the title out to be gold, but truly expressed the fact that I enjoy the title. A video is embedded and a page of videos is linked.

I think the typical gamer is "safe" having read this and reacting to it as they may (and hoping that they watched the videos).

If you were mislead by this review and feel you wasted your $2.99 on the purchase of this title, well, I am sorry to hear it.

I will say that we play maybe 25 games for every 1 we post about. I don't randomly grab a bad game out of the pile and point it out as being bad and not worth a play. I'm not sure who wants to read that and the volume of bad games moving through the App Store is huge.

If there is a situation where a game has been highly anticipated or gotten a great deal of lead-up media coverage and ended up being a real stinker of a title -- that's a scenario in which writing up a bad game is valuable to our readers, in my opinion. If it's a highly unique game that stands out in some way, but is lacking in others, we'll report it - that's worth knowing about.

I stand by the fact that I find Paper Pilot amusing to play. I've always loved the FPS maps made out to be set in a living room or a bathroom, etc. Macusernick recommended Toy Commander. I love that game on my Dreamcast. Is Paper Pilot as good a game as Toy Commander? Not nearly. But, though the graphics were used (legitimately it seems) from the Unity samples (and I was unaware of this when writing the article), they look rather nice. I do agree that Clever Coding's effort here would seem somewhat more impressive had they created their own environments.

I enjoy "flying" through the rooms. But, is it a flight simulator? No.

I mentioned there are certain framerate issues and bemoaned the fact that running into a wall does not crash the paper airplane. I don't feel that I made the title out to be gold, but truly expressed the fact that I enjoy the title. A video is embedded and a page of videos is linked.

I think the typical gamer is "safe" having read this and reacting to it as they may (and hoping that they watched the videos).

If you were mislead by this review and feel you wasted your $2.99 on the purchase of this title, well, I am sorry to hear it.