<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Retro Classic Q*bert Comes to the iPhone as 'CuBert'</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toucharcade.com/2009/02/08/retro-classic-qbert-comes-to-the-iphone-as-cubert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/02/08/retro-classic-qbert-comes-to-the-iphone-as-cubert/</link>
	<description>... keeping in touch with the latest in iPhone gaming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sp00k00ps</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/02/08/retro-classic-qbert-comes-to-the-iphone-as-cubert/#comment-33755</link>
		<dc:creator>sp00k00ps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=1706#comment-33755</guid>
		<description>Wow! You are just trying to cover your poor sore throbbing ass aren&#039;t you? While there are SOME differences like improved graphics and misplaced sound effects (anyone but me notice the Pac-Man sound effects upon eating a fruit?) but you just fail at it all! Crappy Cubert doesn&#039;t even jump right! Here you are, saying how &quot;Cubert is not a blatant and obvious IP violation!&quot; WHEN IT IS! WTF is your price for this shitty excuse for a &#039;decent&#039; game? 1.99. WOW! You\&#039;re going to make THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, and when people find out it is a COPYRIGHT INRINGEMENT you&#039;re going to be making more money than EVAAAAAAA! Epic fail, you are, and a disgrace to the gaming world!

You NEVER asked for permission, you used their sound effects INCORRECTLY (yeah, that musical tone when you win is actually the intro to the first level of the game, the ORIGINAL game!) and when &quot;cubert&quot; dies, all he can say is &quot;bye-bye!&quot; passed off as swearing? You cannot even do that right!

Do us all a favor and lock yourself in a jail cell, better yet, an insane asylum! The world would be better off without copyright infringing creep bastards like you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! You are just trying to cover your poor sore throbbing ass aren't you? While there are SOME differences like improved graphics and misplaced sound effects (anyone but me notice the Pac-Man sound effects upon eating a fruit?) but you just fail at it all! Crappy Cubert doesn't even jump right! Here you are, saying how "Cubert is not a blatant and obvious IP violation!" WHEN IT IS! WTF is your price for this shitty excuse for a 'decent' game? 1.99. WOW! You\'re going to make THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, and when people find out it is a COPYRIGHT INRINGEMENT you're going to be making more money than EVAAAAAAA! Epic fail, you are, and a disgrace to the gaming world!</p>
<p>You NEVER asked for permission, you used their sound effects INCORRECTLY (yeah, that musical tone when you win is actually the intro to the first level of the game, the ORIGINAL game!) and when "cubert" dies, all he can say is "bye-bye!" passed off as swearing? You cannot even do that right!</p>
<p>Do us all a favor and lock yourself in a jail cell, better yet, an insane asylum! The world would be better off without copyright infringing creep bastards like you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sp00k00ps</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/02/08/retro-classic-qbert-comes-to-the-iphone-as-cubert/#comment-298192</link>
		<dc:creator>sp00k00ps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=1706#comment-298192</guid>
		<description>Wow! You are just trying to cover your poor sore throbbing ass aren&#039;t you? While there are SOME differences like improved graphics and misplaced sound effects (anyone but me notice the Pac-Man sound effects upon eating a fruit?) but you just fail at it all! Crappy Cubert doesn&#039;t even jump right! Here you are, saying how &quot;Cubert is not a blatant and obvious IP violation!&quot; WHEN IT IS! WTF is your price for this shitty excuse for a &#039;decent&#039; game? 1.99. WOW! You&#039;re going to make THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, and when people find out it is a COPYRIGHT INRINGEMENT you&#039;re going to be making more money than EVAAAAAAA! Epic fail, you are, and a disgrace to the gaming world!

You NEVER asked for permission, you used their sound effects INCORRECTLY (yeah, that musical tone when you win is actually the intro to the first level of the game, the ORIGINAL game!) and when &quot;cubert&quot; dies, all he can say is &quot;bye-bye!&quot; passed off as swearing? You cannot even do that right!

Do us all a favor and lock yourself in a jail cell, better yet, an insane asylum! The world would be better off without copyright infringing creep bastards like you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! You are just trying to cover your poor sore throbbing ass aren't you? While there are SOME differences like improved graphics and misplaced sound effects (anyone but me notice the Pac-Man sound effects upon eating a fruit?) but you just fail at it all! Crappy Cubert doesn't even jump right! Here you are, saying how "Cubert is not a blatant and obvious IP violation!" WHEN IT IS! WTF is your price for this shitty excuse for a 'decent' game? 1.99. WOW! You're going to make THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, and when people find out it is a COPYRIGHT INRINGEMENT you're going to be making more money than EVAAAAAAA! Epic fail, you are, and a disgrace to the gaming world!</p>
<p>You NEVER asked for permission, you used their sound effects INCORRECTLY (yeah, that musical tone when you win is actually the intro to the first level of the game, the ORIGINAL game!) and when "cubert" dies, all he can say is "bye-bye!" passed off as swearing? You cannot even do that right!</p>
<p>Do us all a favor and lock yourself in a jail cell, better yet, an insane asylum! The world would be better off without copyright infringing creep bastards like you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arn</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/02/08/retro-classic-qbert-comes-to-the-iphone-as-cubert/#comment-12866</link>
		<dc:creator>arn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=1706#comment-12866</guid>
		<description>@mgabrys

same article: &quot;Gottlieb was bought by Columbia Pictures in 1977.&quot;

http://www.sonypictures.com/mobile/qbert_title.html: &quot;Qbert is a trademark of Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mgabrys</p>
<p>same article: "Gottlieb was bought by Columbia Pictures in 1977."</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sonypictures.com/mobile/qbert_title.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.sonypictures.com/mobile/qbert_title.html</a>: "Qbert is a trademark of Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arn</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/02/08/retro-classic-qbert-comes-to-the-iphone-as-cubert/#comment-298191</link>
		<dc:creator>arn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=1706#comment-298191</guid>
		<description>@mgabrys

same article: &quot;Gottlieb was bought by Columbia Pictures in 1977.&quot;

http://www.sonypictures.com/mobile/qbert_title.html: &quot;Qbert is a trademark of Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mgabrys</p>
<p>same article: "Gottlieb was bought by Columbia Pictures in 1977."</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sonypictures.com/mobile/qbert_title.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.sonypictures.com/mobile/qbert_title.html</a>: "Qbert is a trademark of Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mgabrys</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/02/08/retro-classic-qbert-comes-to-the-iphone-as-cubert/#comment-12864</link>
		<dc:creator>mgabrys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=1706#comment-12864</guid>
		<description>re: sony - WRONG! Hey - dija know there&#039;s a neat thing called Wikipedia? It&#039;s cool and internet-y!

from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mylstar

&quot;Today, Gottlieb&#039;s pinball machines (along with those distributed under the Mylstar and Premier names), as well as the &quot;Gottlieb&quot; and &quot;D. Gottlieb &amp; Co.&quot; trademarks (USPTO registration nos. 1403592 and 2292766, and other numbers in countries around the world), are owned by Gottlieb Development LLC, a New York limited liability company&quot;

Psssst. That&#039;s not Sony. That would be a company in Japan. New York City is a town in the United States of America. Neat-o! 

Please though - don&#039;t let me get in the way of your smug misinformation campaign. Self-righteous retards are fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: sony - WRONG! Hey - dija know there's a neat thing called Wikipedia? It's cool and internet-y!</p>
<p>from: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mylstar" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mylstar</a></p>
<p>"Today, Gottlieb's pinball machines (along with those distributed under the Mylstar and Premier names), as well as the "Gottlieb" and "D. Gottlieb &amp; Co." trademarks (USPTO registration nos. 1403592 and 2292766, and other numbers in countries around the world), are owned by Gottlieb Development LLC, a New York limited liability company"</p>
<p>Psssst. That's not Sony. That would be a company in Japan. New York City is a town in the United States of America. Neat-o! </p>
<p>Please though - don't let me get in the way of your smug misinformation campaign. Self-righteous retards are fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mgabrys</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/02/08/retro-classic-qbert-comes-to-the-iphone-as-cubert/#comment-298190</link>
		<dc:creator>mgabrys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=1706#comment-298190</guid>
		<description>re: sony - WRONG! Hey - dija know there&#039;s a neat thing called Wikipedia? It&#039;s cool and internet-y!

from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mylstar

&quot;Today, Gottlieb&#039;s pinball machines (along with those distributed under the Mylstar and Premier names), as well as the &quot;Gottlieb&quot; and &quot;D. Gottlieb &amp; Co.&quot; trademarks (USPTO registration nos. 1403592 and 2292766, and other numbers in countries around the world), are owned by Gottlieb Development LLC, a New York limited liability company&quot;

Psssst. That&#039;s not Sony. That would be a company in Japan. New York City is a town in the United States of America. Neat-o! 

Please though - don&#039;t let me get in the way of your smug misinformation campaign. Self-righteous retards are fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: sony - WRONG! Hey - dija know there's a neat thing called Wikipedia? It's cool and internet-y!</p>
<p>from: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mylstar" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mylstar</a></p>
<p>"Today, Gottlieb's pinball machines (along with those distributed under the Mylstar and Premier names), as well as the "Gottlieb" and "D. Gottlieb &amp; Co." trademarks (USPTO registration nos. 1403592 and 2292766, and other numbers in countries around the world), are owned by Gottlieb Development LLC, a New York limited liability company"</p>
<p>Psssst. That's not Sony. That would be a company in Japan. New York City is a town in the United States of America. Neat-o! </p>
<p>Please though - don't let me get in the way of your smug misinformation campaign. Self-righteous retards are fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenixfury</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/02/08/retro-classic-qbert-comes-to-the-iphone-as-cubert/#comment-12513</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenixfury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=1706#comment-12513</guid>
		<description>HHG, I have to admit I was pretty excited to get Q#bert in some form on my iPod Touch, but not at the expense of the original developers losing money.  Maybe you could put a bug in the original devs ear to release an official port or emulation of the original game?  I&#039;d also like to drop the first feature request..  I would love the same swipe control like Pac-Man, or Frogger although the dev of this app did tap control very well, so I&#039;d love that as an option too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HHG, I have to admit I was pretty excited to get Q#bert in some form on my iPod Touch, but not at the expense of the original developers losing money.  Maybe you could put a bug in the original devs ear to release an official port or emulation of the original game?  I'd also like to drop the first feature request..  I would love the same swipe control like Pac-Man, or Frogger although the dev of this app did tap control very well, so I'd love that as an option too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenixfury</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/02/08/retro-classic-qbert-comes-to-the-iphone-as-cubert/#comment-298189</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenixfury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=1706#comment-298189</guid>
		<description>HHG, I have to admit I was pretty excited to get Q#bert in some form on my iPod Touch, but not at the expense of the original developers losing money.  Maybe you could put a bug in the original devs ear to release an official port or emulation of the original game?  I&#039;d also like to drop the first feature request..  I would love the same swipe control like Pac-Man, or Frogger although the dev of this app did tap control very well, so I&#039;d love that as an option too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HHG, I have to admit I was pretty excited to get Q#bert in some form on my iPod Touch, but not at the expense of the original developers losing money.  Maybe you could put a bug in the original devs ear to release an official port or emulation of the original game?  I'd also like to drop the first feature request..  I would love the same swipe control like Pac-Man, or Frogger although the dev of this app did tap control very well, so I'd love that as an option too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HHG</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/02/08/retro-classic-qbert-comes-to-the-iphone-as-cubert/#comment-12365</link>
		<dc:creator>HHG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=1706#comment-12365</guid>
		<description>Hey dev... 

Thanks for the link to the USPTO.   It&#039;s great to see the Q*Bert IP is still -&gt;LIVE&lt;- and maintained by Columbia Pictures - which is Sony Pictures.    

Whats great is Dev&#039;s who not only STEAL IP - but broadcast how to contact the owners:   http://maps.google.com/maps?q=columbia%20pictures%20culver%20city%20ca&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sa=N&amp;hl=en&amp;tab=wl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey dev... </p>
<p>Thanks for the link to the USPTO.   It's great to see the Q*Bert IP is still -&gt;LIVE&lt;- and maintained by Columbia Pictures - which is Sony Pictures.    </p>
<p>Whats great is Dev's who not only STEAL IP - but broadcast how to contact the owners:   <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=columbia%20pictures%20culver%20city%20ca&#038;oe=utf-8&#038;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;um=1&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;sa=N&#038;hl=en&#038;tab=wl" rel="nofollow">http://maps.google.com/maps?q=columbia%20pictures%20culver%20city%20ca&#038;oe=utf-8&#038;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;um=1&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;sa=N&#038;hl=en&#038;tab=wl</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HHG</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/02/08/retro-classic-qbert-comes-to-the-iphone-as-cubert/#comment-298188</link>
		<dc:creator>HHG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=1706#comment-298188</guid>
		<description>Hey dev... 

Thanks for the link to the USPTO.   It&#039;s great to see the Q*Bert IP is still -&gt;LIVE&lt;- and maintained by Columbia Pictures - which is Sony Pictures.    

Whats great is Dev&#039;s who not only STEAL IP - but broadcast how to contact the owners:   http://maps.google.com/maps?q=columbia%20pictures%20culver%20city%20ca&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sa=N&amp;hl=en&amp;tab=wl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey dev... </p>
<p>Thanks for the link to the USPTO.   It's great to see the Q*Bert IP is still -&gt;LIVE&lt;- and maintained by Columbia Pictures - which is Sony Pictures.    </p>
<p>Whats great is Dev's who not only STEAL IP - but broadcast how to contact the owners:   <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=columbia%20pictures%20culver%20city%20ca&#038;oe=utf-8&#038;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;um=1&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;sa=N&#038;hl=en&#038;tab=wl" rel="nofollow">http://maps.google.com/maps?q=columbia%20pictures%20culver%20city%20ca&#038;oe=utf-8&#038;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;um=1&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;sa=N&#038;hl=en&#038;tab=wl</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HHG</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/02/08/retro-classic-qbert-comes-to-the-iphone-as-cubert/#comment-12363</link>
		<dc:creator>HHG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=1706#comment-12363</guid>
		<description>Hey Folks.....

Ive had the pleasure to work with both Warren Davis and Jeff Lee - the team who created this game.  Hate to see the work of a couple of friends so blatantly stolen.  It&#039;s not just the name.  It&#039;s the visual and audio works that are protected.   

Needless to say.  The IP police should be on their way.   Suggestion to dev:  Pull the product and respect the law and works of others.

UGGH!!!

Thx,
HHG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Folks.....</p>
<p>Ive had the pleasure to work with both Warren Davis and Jeff Lee - the team who created this game.  Hate to see the work of a couple of friends so blatantly stolen.  It's not just the name.  It's the visual and audio works that are protected.   </p>
<p>Needless to say.  The IP police should be on their way.   Suggestion to dev:  Pull the product and respect the law and works of others.</p>
<p>UGGH!!!</p>
<p>Thx,<br />
HHG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HHG</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/02/08/retro-classic-qbert-comes-to-the-iphone-as-cubert/#comment-298187</link>
		<dc:creator>HHG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=1706#comment-298187</guid>
		<description>Hey Folks.....

Ive had the pleasure to work with both Warren Davis and Jeff Lee - the team who created this game.  Hate to see the work of a couple of friends so blatantly stolen.  It&#039;s not just the name.  It&#039;s the visual and audio works that are protected.   

Needless to say.  The IP police should be on their way.   Suggestion to dev:  Pull the product and respect the law and works of others.

UGGH!!!

Thx,
HHG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Folks.....</p>
<p>Ive had the pleasure to work with both Warren Davis and Jeff Lee - the team who created this game.  Hate to see the work of a couple of friends so blatantly stolen.  It's not just the name.  It's the visual and audio works that are protected.   </p>
<p>Needless to say.  The IP police should be on their way.   Suggestion to dev:  Pull the product and respect the law and works of others.</p>
<p>UGGH!!!</p>
<p>Thx,<br />
HHG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/02/08/retro-classic-qbert-comes-to-the-iphone-as-cubert/#comment-12325</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=1706#comment-12325</guid>
		<description>Why is everyone acting so high and mighty?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is everyone acting so high and mighty?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/02/08/retro-classic-qbert-comes-to-the-iphone-as-cubert/#comment-298186</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=1706#comment-298186</guid>
		<description>Why is everyone acting so high and mighty?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is everyone acting so high and mighty?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spiffyone</title>
		<link>http://toucharcade.com/2009/02/08/retro-classic-qbert-comes-to-the-iphone-as-cubert/#comment-12320</link>
		<dc:creator>spiffyone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toucharcade.com/?p=1706#comment-12320</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Marco...but it is a blatant violation.  Once you get a C&amp;D order you&#039;ll know this to be true, and I suspect you eventually will.

There is homage and parody, but this is out and out disregard for IP.  Changing it from &quot;Q*Bert&quot; to &quot;Cu*Bert&quot;, a title that, when said aloud, sounds EXACTLY like the original, and one that &quot;shares&quot; character design as well is blatant IP violation.

Perhaps you did not educate yourself enough in this matter, and feel that simply changing the title will be sufficient to circumnavigate the perils of a lawsuit at worst or a simple C&amp;D order at best.  If so, you have probably made a grave error in judgment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Marco...but it is a blatant violation.  Once you get a C&amp;D order you'll know this to be true, and I suspect you eventually will.</p>
<p>There is homage and parody, but this is out and out disregard for IP.  Changing it from "Q*Bert" to "Cu*Bert", a title that, when said aloud, sounds EXACTLY like the original, and one that "shares" character design as well is blatant IP violation.</p>
<p>Perhaps you did not educate yourself enough in this matter, and feel that simply changing the title will be sufficient to circumnavigate the perils of a lawsuit at worst or a simple C&amp;D order at best.  If so, you have probably made a grave error in judgment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/7 queries in 0.006 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 358/362 objects using memcached

Served from: toucharcade.com @ 2012-02-10 08:01:02 -->
